I beg you to run that cover complete with "YAY! SPIDEY" on it. :)

I really hope my comic shop has ordered some Swing Shift in...!

Posted by Fetsur on 2008-01-29 19:19:26
Spider-man with Great Power?
Since Spider-man is about youth not great power and responsibility, shouldn't that have been titled, "Spider-man With Great Youth"?

Posted by jefseg77 on 2008-01-29 21:25:03
Ha!
Good one jefseg77! It's funny because you took his words out of context, exagerated them into an unbending law, and threw them back at him in the most pedantic way possible!

You the man!

Posted by Jason M Bryant on 2008-01-29 23:21:36
Director's Cut? Behind the Scenes looks? I hate it when people in comics use cinema terms for material that has nothing to do with film and everything to do with Editorial and Illustration.

Posted by underscore on 2008-01-30 01:07:21
Timeless, huh?
"Timeless" like the Bush Administration or "timeless" like the New Coke?

Posted by chrisoconnell on 2008-01-30 05:55:39
Swing shift
I dunno about everyone having read it on Free Comic Book Day, never saw hide nor hair of it in my part of the UK. Does any country except the US get much in the way of FCBD stuff?

Oh, and I agree with underscore, director's cut indeed . . . you're in comics guys, be proud!

Posted by Volthoom on 2008-01-30 10:06:17
despite I 'm the biggest fan of the Defenders in the world, and had been the most happy person in the world when I heard about the new release by Joey Casey, I had been incredibely shocked with the previews I had seen...where it is showed Nighthawk switching an uppercut to the vilain...

I prefer warning everybody to even p.ss me off with violence in comic-books.
When I feel alone in the world, I could be able to say stupidities ( you haven't heard them all by the way ) like :
'Frank Miller is my self-defense teacher', right, sometimes I really mean it (Daredevil :Origins, drawn by John Romita Jr ) , and I'm sure that it's not the first uppercut showed in comics.
I'm not boxing, I even do not watch it on TV.
But I'm old enough to know that only one punch well given where it is needed can kill somedody.

I'm sorry but Nighthawk is a killer.



Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-01-30 10:49:20
you apparently don't feel very concerned...

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-01-30 10:50:10
Notapotatoe:
I'm not even sure what point you're trying to get across, so it's hard to feel concerned.
Or what relevance this is to Swing Shift.

Posted by doncorswhazie on 2008-01-30 12:38:46
No Amazing Spiderman This Week
Thank God!

Posted by courtney_miami08 on 2008-01-30 14:02:23
Issue 548
Just as lame as the rest since this alternate reality began.

Posted by courtney_miami08 on 2008-01-30 14:04:07
Well dayum, I guess I will just have to make due reading Captain America.

Posted by Tom Reed on 2008-01-30 14:22:32
I'm saving money, Thanks Marvel!
You know I was inerested in Tony Harris who I love as an artist and David Lapham who is amazing as a writer. I cannot support what's been done to Spidey in any form. I wonder how your going to handle him in New Avengers and Secret Invasion. It kind of makes me cringe. It's as if i'm bracing for a hit. Then I look at the bright side, It'll be less dollars I have to spend for mediocre stories. It puzzles me that Breevort who edited Civil War agreed to the Spidey changes. They may noy have know what to do with Spidey but they helped me narrow my hobby budget. Thanks.


Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-01-30 17:56:46
No Amazing...
...but Ultimate Spiderman is out this week! I know all the spotlight is on Amazing these days, but let's not forget about the other Spidey title.

No Mephisto there!

Posted by egotrip02 on 2008-01-30 18:50:41
:doncorswhazie,

it's quiet simple, you probably heard about people jumping off the roof of their house, or others who caught bombs-kit on the Net.That's the same thing here, if someone imitates THIS punch exactly this way with -case of circumstances- all the anger or the forces he got, he could just kill someone, like that...
that's not a problem ?
Is that what about comics are ?

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-01-31 12:23:09
Yay
Its a Brand New Week not to buy Brand New Day

Posted by mre2u on 2008-01-31 16:00:15
Awesome no brand new dump this week

Posted by Seru1 on 2008-01-31 20:41:11
notapotatoe:

would you have wolverines claws edited because some kid could stick butterknives between his fingers and attack someone?

lets face it, this is 2008, kids are growing up with the internet, with fox news (open dig at fox), they'll know how to fight or kill without ever touching a comic book. it seems like you just want attention, and here i (like a fool) fell for it. happy now?

Posted by hxcscarecrow on 2008-01-31 21:45:05
an history of violence
hxcscarecrow:

excuse me sir,if I'm the one having to set-up arguments, I'll be foolishized very soon.
You would be surprised:
I'm actually living in Switzerland, where everybody'rich and dance Techtonik, and where people have their army weapon at house.You would be surprised then,about the numbers of murders made by citizen and young people (out of the army just for two or three days ) using their military weapons.To be completely honest with you, I'd like you to know that I'm not a chipmunk,another example :
right here, in this blog, check out the Art Avalanche session where it is shown a page by Alan Davis of 'Fantastic Four :The End', one of the last pages actually, where FF and friends just won.I was properly horrified seeing Reed the way Davis drew him, with a facial expression that I had never seen in his face, he was not a hero, he was far worse than a desperado, there were no lettering but all I could deduce from a such expression was : this guy is thinking ' we f.ck them...finally we f.ck them'.Right, Reed like I hadn't seen him before.Then I hadn't read 'FF:The End', and actually I didn't buy it despite I'm a fan of Davis but the first thing I checked was if this expression on Reed's face had stayed.See by your self on Tom's blog and compare with the printing edition,but I'm telling you now :
no, it wasn't here anymore.
Just ask Marvel Editors why this peculiar draw hadn't been kept, but let me give you my opinion before : it hadn't been kept because this drawing was too LOADED.
And comic-books artists have to be really careful with such things because young people who are seeking for answers and just take what fall into their hands are very receptive to this kind of things.As almost an human being now ( doing my best ) I had learn levels of reading, when I'm watching horrors movies, I know that the director is doing style exercise.It's the same with violence, Wolvie got knives so I'm preparing my self to see him kniving out, same for the Punisher because I know that litterature and comics-books are also here to putting some limits for some case of circumstances ( guards-madmen,mind-keepering I don't have the expression ) but you never know that it will be received this way.
There are some kicks who are just cut-killers, and this one is.



Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 01:25:15
*ç%%&&/()
(...) you never kow IF it' ll be received this way receipt this way.

+°""*ç*%&T//)(//&

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 01:29:54
it's not comic repeating effect
RECEIPT THIS WAY

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 01:30:35
that's comic repating effect
+°°*çE%&&R&%/&&&%ç%çE

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 01:31:34
I just couldn't...
I saw Swing Shift, and I almost picked it up. As much as I hate Brand New Day so far, I'm looking for anything to turn it around for me. I'm hoping that there's some sort of "surprise" regarding Jackpot and it's not who everyone thinks it is, but after the non-surprise ending of OMD, I just don't have faith in the Spidey office right now. ...and yes I know it's a new group of people, but the first three issues did not justify what was lost via OMD. The story could've been told with a married Peter and any other friend instead of Harry. The anger has left but the saddness and disapointment remains.

Posted by vijinand on 2008-02-01 08:32:22
Get over yourselves!
Notapotatoe:

Um didn't read your entry to know it's not exactly what I sign on for. Your somebody who babbles on barely coherent because you think people are going to read what you say and then the jokes on them. Yah, you got the attention you sorely need because like the impressionable kids you speak of you also suffer from some personality or mood disorder. Take your meds. Don't waste your time or mine. It's rude.

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-01 09:23:11
warriorspirit97 :

Wish you were here.I'm easy.
I don't especially ask for attention.In your case I could just say :Give your brain the time needed, that's okay.Big sky.
Just don't talk to me like you would do with your young sister, it's kinda embarassing.
Don't tell me neither to take my medicine because I'm not insulting, I'm asking what is important for you people, the posters, as for people, the authors, who produce these kind of pictures, if they feel responsible, or if they realize what they're doing.I 'm kinda interested about the standarts concerning violence in Marvel Productions as I was with professionnals criteres.
So that's said, you're welcome whenever you want in NotapotatoeLand.

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 10:52:04
Honest, I don't especially understand your attitude, and I'm asking my self if someone can talk about other things that isn't in the summary post ,or if everybody is really too busy with the closer Golden Loeb,wich is kinda frightening too.

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-01 10:57:55
Spell check and Ambien help!
The reason I read comics is for suspension of disbelief. Not to get wrapped up in some pseudo psycho-social debate with someone who made allusions to being my little sister. Gender confusion anyone!?! Anyone here actually want to write about comics and not be on a soapbox about societies ills. The idea that Spider-man is going through a similar clone saga phase where everything sucked and Spider-Man went to the bottom of the heap is the debate at large. What do people have to say about that?

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-01 15:43:38
Wow my comment was deleted. How sad.
So i can't express my thoughts in reference to another blogger whose comments I donot agree with? I would have thought that I was being mildly controversial and a little offensive but to delete the comment? Are the people monitoring this blog eunuchs? Clearly I don't have any real animus towards nopotatoe in fact he's a counter point to what I am saying in some sense. That's why blogs exist. Peopl aren' t going to agree or even be nice but let them say it.

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-01 16:28:49
Black Day
I have read most of the main stream spider-man titles since the early 1990's (ASM #374 to be specific). I have noticed that the theme in Spider-man books is the betrayal of the character and the fanbase by constanting giving false hope that there is a bright future for Spider-man. A light is seen at the end of the tunnel and then disaster strikes (i.e. Mary Jane is pregnant, oops miscarriage, Peter, MJ, and Aunt May finally live the life they deserve in Stark Tower, nope lets throw them to the wolves and shoot Aunt May, Peter and MJ are happily married, sorry the Marvel editing staff decides to betray the very moral fiber of the character and the one staple of this series for the past twenty years to try and make a few bucks.) I am disgusted by what Marvel has done to my former favorite character. I hope that the Marvel Editorial staff enjoys their thirty pieces of silver. I hate to say this but "Make Mine anything but Marvel."

P.S. Thanks for ruining the Venom character and giving Eddie Brock cancer. Oh, I almost forgot, thanks for killing Captain America, a character popular since the 1940's and also one of my favorites. Bravo.

Posted by rorschach812 on 2008-02-01 23:09:02
...earth people :
: warriorspirit97,

being 'soapbox about societies ills '.That's exactly about it.
I'm mean , do you like Tom Cruise in front of the complete Scientologists Church asking if they 'HAVE TO CLEAN THE WORD '? according that Cruise seems to have the minute of glory he was looking for ? I personnally don't want -in my world- tons of case of circumstances wich nobody cares about that could permit some people having the kind of Cruise's scaring attitude...
These are authors who have responsibilities about the way they 're showing things, and who are taking very much a few of many liberties about that.What do you think about learning the death of someone close to you because of someone have seen something ( here, a fatal kick ) somewhere and did it too, because he thinked it was allowed.
There are people who kill because got nervous breakdowns, and there are people who kill because they are borred.
You can't say that 'sh.ts happened' then , because it's your responsability also; then it explains some attitudes like Tom was talking about in the comics-shop retailer post, intending that you coud contract AIDS just by reading a Marvel book.
But that's not all, you can also be f.cked for long.

You're right,maybe it's better to end the discussion about it, because people could start to think that we got feelings for each other, but I don't care about it.
I'd really like to have an answer about it.


Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-02 06:36:34
Spider-Manifesto
I picked up Swing Shift, even though I already have the FCBD edition. Normally I'm not too enticed by the bonus material in this sort of thing, but I thought the Manifesto was super interesting. Marvel really seems to have embraced a certain level of creative transparency in the last few years, and I love it. It's so valuable for fans to have this sort of insight into the editorial process. Thanks for sharing!

(Also, I can't wait to see how many of the ideas laid out in the Manifesto actually end up in the books, e.g. the Betty Brant plotline. I think Brand New Day is off to a strong start; I'm more excited about the Spider-Man books than I've been in some time.)

Posted by interrobanger on 2008-02-02 22:50:59
re: Black Day comment
I have to agree completely with this comment, for I was basically going to say the same thing:

"I have read most of the main stream spider-man titles since the early 1990s. I have noticed that the theme in Spider-man books is the betrayal of the character and the fanbase by constanting giving false hope that there is a bright future for Spider-man....I hope that the Marvel Editorial staff enjoys their thirty pieces of silver.
Posted by rorschach812 on 2008-02-02 00:09:02"

Now, that said, the whole point of Spidey and PP is the "Parker Bad Luck." But that still doesn't excuse what OMD and BND have done to Spider-Man.

What I can't stand about BND is that it isn't fixable like the John Byrn Spider-Man crap-days in late 1990 before JMS took over and saved it. Even if MJ and PP get back together, the WHOLE continuity is ruined.

This is just a feeble excuse for different writers and artists to reinterpret the same old storylines: Harry Osborn as the Goblin, Aunt May finding out Peter's secret AGAIN, etc, etc.
BORING!

And how could JMS allow this? His seven years of careful storytelling are GONE! The DON'T EXIST anymore in the Marvel Universe. That is dumb.

I only hope that by ASM#600 the Scarlet Witch undos what Mephisto did and replaces the continuity.

Good News; I love the artwork, and the writing is superb, regardless of the crappy "undoing" power of JMS beautiful 7 years of storytelling.

So much for evolution of storytelling and character developing.


Posted by PerryParker on 2008-02-02 23:31:56
re: non-comic bitching
Let's keep this blog commenting about the Spider-Man comic. Who gives a crap about Nighthawk's punching which is reminiscent of the gun violence in Switzerland or whatever the hell you guy's are talking about. This is supposed to be talk about comics, not real life! Aren't there any moderators for this blog to delete un-comic talk!!?!?!?

Posted by PerryParker on 2008-02-02 23:34:05
I DON'T UNDERSTAND...?
Since childhood I have been a loyal Spidey fan. I've taken breaks from constant comic reading here and there but whenever I came back Spider-Man was the same. I missed out on the Whole Civil War Hoopla - I'm reading it now - I'm back reading every issue of Amazing and it's not the same character??? First off, I don't think the Webhead from 5-10 years ago would have ever unmasked himself, that's not him. But he did in Civil War, now it seems like out of an act of desperation, to erase that story-mistake, they throw in Mephisto and try to restore things. I don't understand... What is going on? Where is the original Spider-Man that we all know? It seems quality writing is escaping him... Spider-Man making deals with demons/devils? I doubt that would of happened 5-10 years ago too...

Posted by xxtortion on 2008-02-03 04:40:23
Spiderman
I have read spiderman for almost 30 years, ist uk reprints then us comics. If this new storyline is not a what if story or an alternate reality I will be dropping another marvel series.

Posted by mcconnell12 on 2008-02-03 08:13:03
spiderman
Oh, and id you wanted to bring back dead charaters have you not got the ultimate universe to do this in. Marvel are saying that marraige is not for their heroes. Change this storyline before its too late Please.

Ohe and Alexa Medez is gorgeous

Posted by mcconnell12 on 2008-02-03 08:17:16
Spider-Man
Brand New Day (how to put everything back the way it should be) The Watcher wakes up and says WHAT A BAD DREAM NOBODY WOULD DESTROY SPIDER-MAN KILL CAPTAIN AMERICA MAKE IRON MAN RULER OF THE EARTH DESTROY THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE MARVEL UNIVERSE NO FRIENDS NO FAMILY BAD IS GOOD,GOOD IS BAD. And know shrull invasion have I been l cheated reading about imposters when will it end and get everything back the way it should.

last thing a question who are the writers writing for because I don`t think its for the readers anymore because I its not the way I or my friends won`t it to go




Posted by Roy12345 on 2008-02-03 14:21:19
Re: Spider-Man by Roy12345
Just because the stories aren't being written the way that you think they should be, doesn't mean that they aren't 'writing for the readers'. Just because you and your friends don't want it to go that way doesn't mean that that isn't the natural progression of things, given the circumstances. Writers should always write what they think is the best and most natural story for whatever characters and audience they are trying to reach. Writers and editors can't cater to everyone's 'needs' and desires for what should happen in a story. There are way too many opinions out there, and a good chunk of the time, people don't know what it is that they even want.

Spider-Man was not destroyed, he was made relevant again. In a somewhat crappy fashion? Yeah, I'll give you that. But true test of whether or not a story as controversial as OMD is ultimately good or bad can't be the story itself, it's the work that follows it. The same can be said for everything that has happened in the past few years. Steve Rogers dying made me furious, but the stories since then have been both logical and fascinating. Iron Man isn't the ruler of the world, but being Director of S.H.I.E.L.D. has made me more interesting than ever. How about this one? Avengers: Disassembled? Worst thing ever, right? Destroyed the franchise. But oh yeah, now Avengers is the best selling franchise in Marvel and almost always a great story. How about House of M and M-Day? Wiped out all the mutants, ruining the X-Men, right? Messiah CompleX was one of the best X-Men stories I have ever read.

It's hard to put things back 'to the way it should be' when everything that it has become is more interesting, natural, and tells for a better story with stronger characterization and more accessibility.

Posted by 616 Spider-Man on 2008-02-03 23:57:44
To Roy12345 and similar posters.
ok... seriously. Wow... I just can't understand why you're all taking this so personally and taking it out on the editors. You seriously want to do the "its a bad dream" thing yet still claim to know what makes a good story? hahahahaha. I actually needed to take a break from laughing so i could write this. You lump in the recent developments in Cap and Iron Man to OMD? Wow... two completely different topics. What's been going on in those books is brilliant story telling. Those books are receiving their highest reviews and praise in years. Brubaker has been telling amazing stories without the use of Cap (although the new cap is a great character in his own right.) I don't read Iron man but I haven't heard one bad thing about it from people who do read it. I personally love seeing Stark show up in the books i do read. He's such an interesting/ conflicted character nowadays.



Posted by Anson17 on 2008-02-04 00:11:58
Spidey's messed-up
Seriously, 35 years reading Spider-man -- and I've seen some editorial cop-outs in my time... there was no "miscarriage" -- that baby (May) was carted off to Europe somewhere by Norman -- has it been 10 years yet?!?! Where is she?! Now, was she ever even born?! Remember Mary Jane blown-up on a plane!! It wasn't until Peter spent a year in denial and then finally accepted her death that she shows up as a captive ?!?!?! Man -- lame-o!! In regards to One More Day -- why didn't Spidey contact Loki who offered him a "boon" after saving his daughter a few JMS years back?!?! That's got to be better than making a deal with Mephisto! And why on Earth would Peter sacrifice his true-love for his 120 yr old aunt?! (I know he was guilt ridden -- but that was his wife !) And if Marvel just had to bring Harry back ... um, I actually think a clone would have gone over better. (I remember a robot Harry in an annual a few years back ) I'm recalling the John Byrne reboot -- remember moving to vol. 2-- where did the lessons learned there go?! They obviously wern't retained. Or perhaps they were. We have been re-booted after all -- (I also thought Brand New Day was great it made me feel 10 again.!)

Posted by digital guru on 2008-02-04 07:55:19
spider-man
Get Dr strange to fix spideys continuity to the way it was prior to civil war if you want his id secret.

Joe Q is going to bring marvel down, he should have let aunt may die and have baby may returned Just think of the storline that would have generated

Posted by mcconnell12 on 2008-02-04 14:29:47
Got Continuity?!?
It was cool, digital guru that you knew all that continuity. It made me remember the cool times. Thanks. I won't be picking up BND but the memories make me smile. Until they fix this mess definitely have memories.

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-04 16:35:29
Continuity -- what a concept!
I erred in my previous blog by calling MJ the love of Peter's life. We all know (or should ) who that was. (By the way aside from Gwen's children... her clone is still out there... somewhere. Was she ever seen again?! Don't think so. ) It is obvious to me that having a coherent Spider-man story line takes a back seat to maintaining that accessability that Roy 1-5 wrote about. Spider-man after all is one of the biggest merchandising commodities in the world and the post CW Spidey was getting pretty dark -- but I still think there should be one "true" continuity and it should be maintained in Amazing -- There's Marvel Adventure and Ultimate -- to explore new scenarios -- I remember the last time they chickened out on killing off Aunt May. After six months it turned out that the woman who died was a cosmetically altered actress Norman had planted! I mentioned the last attempt to have Peter single again in my earlier posting... It's not a matter of making everyone happy -- it's should only be a matter of building upon what came before so that people who spend time and money in this fantasy world are not cheated when all that they saw happen; all the struggles and triumphs -- are taken away to bolster some spreadsheets bottom line. Peter kicking Wilson Fisk's butt in prison was so classic -- and now meaningless. Never happened. "The Other" storyline? Imagine that one with no Mary Jane attatched! Another cause of this continuity tradgedy is that Spidey went mainstream back in 2002 and now anyone who saw the movies can pick up a comic and be right in step. ("Oh look Harry's still alive in the comic! They'll say.) Marvel has done some absolutely exceptional work in the past 5 years -- The Ultimates, Civil War, World War Hulk -- it is a spectacular time to be a comic book fan (thankyou JQ) -- but sheesh as good as I thought Brand New Day was (is?) -- in the big picture... they squashed the Spider. Mushed it good.

Posted by digital guru on 2008-02-04 23:37:54
a denial ?
-PerryParker :

are you high or voluntary retarded ? Do you really mean what you said ?
'this is about comics here, not real life '
And what comics are about PLEASE ?
Looks like I'm not the only one to have problems with self-defense (yeah I've been assaulted and knived 75 knives so it still hurt,especially when I'm laughing )

Beware, beware, you 'll face a lot of desillusions when you'll see Tony Stark with a pin's where it is written ' I blog ' and Colossus getting pregnant.

Posted by notapotatoe on 2008-02-05 07:00:02
The Sad Facts and Re: 616 Spider-Man
616 Spider-Man makes some good points, but here's the key line:

"Writers should always write what they think is the best and most natural story for whatever characters and audience they are trying to reach."

OMD did not reflect neither the BEST nor MOST NATURAL story of the Spider-Man saga based upon the history of the character. I wish I could say that BND has erased all these concerns, but after OMD, I've decided to discontinue reading Spider-Man. This is truly unfortunate because I'm sure the new creative teams are putting their heart and souls into this storyline. Discontinuing Spidey may seem like a total fanboy reaction, and I am not one to stop reading because of new creative directions (in fact, if done *WELL*, I love them! What's being done on Cap has me anxious and impatient for each next issue!) but everything about OMD was UNNATURAL and completely AGAINST the character attributes of the Peter Parker that I have been reading since 1987...nevermind that it completely throws the last 20 years of history into a complete tailspin!
I refuse to return to Spidey until a "continuity one-shot" or something of the like is produced to definitively explain where the Marvel U sits right now and how Spidey has fit into it over the past 20 years (I will not read 3 issues a month for a year to try to piece together this retcon trash!). Until then, forget it. I'll keep reading Cap and Thunderbolts, but Spidey (who was my core title) will be on his own. In the meantime maybe Peter will get some counseling to move past this Oedipal hang-up with Aunt May, or just sleep with her and get it over with so he can move on with his life (and Mephisto can laugh like a monkey!)
Good luck Marvel. I hope this all fits into some master plan that I'm too simple-minded to see, but will really appreciate in the long run...unfortunateley I'm in my mid-30's and desperately looking for reasons to justify my crack-like comic book addiction...OMD makes me fear that it may be time to kick the habit...

Posted by mcjohn75 on 2008-02-05 21:34:16
Well writ McJohn!
You tell 'em!

Posted by digital guru on 2008-02-05 21:41:25
Fear leads to anger!
The idea about allowing characters to go through naturally paces was lost on Breevort and Quesada. This is a comic book but still allow the character to breathe. He was a felon with very few options. With Aunt May in the hospital in a coma that led to Mephisto wanting to tempt him further into despair. That's what the devil is supposed to do. What could have happened after could have led to him actually putting the character of Aunt May into a better place. JS made her cool. He could have made her cooler. He could have allowed Spider Man to grow up. Now we have a thirty yr old who lives wiith his Aunt? This crap could have worked in the 60's. Marvel needs to grow up!

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-09 10:35:56
All good things come to an end.
There was the notion during OMD that Peter Parker was going to grow up. That he would lose another loved one due to the moral decisions he makes. This would have played perfectly with his origin. Then out of fear they reversehim to a thirty year old who lives with his aunt and still can't get his head out of his butt. Ugh! OMD was actually quite good. It played perfectly into his mythos. The BND storyline is an abberation from that. Breevort and Quesada did him wrong.

Posted by warriorspirit97 on 2008-02-10 09:34:00