Question...
Tom,
What do you think of the current system by which people are able to submit to Marvel? Do you think the system works as a means of finding new talent? What would you do to improve it? Similarly, what, from your personal experiences with dealing with new and up & coming talent, would you recommend to new talent if they want to get and keep working in your department?
Posted by astrosapien on 2006-09-25 22:00:46
Here's a question
What do you do for fun to take your mind off of your work? The rest of us read comics. What do you do when you need to veg out?
Posted by bigdaddyhub2 on 2006-09-25 22:25:46
Is truth stranger than fiction?
OK, obviously without spoiling anything, can you talk about what your doing to make sure the upcoming changes in Thunderbolts don't result in what happened to the faux Exiles in your recent Marvel simulation.
I imagine that you're dealing with a readership that's already skittish in the wake of the FightBolts debacle. Are Joe Q.'s recent Newsarama comments listing that as one of his greatest regrets part of a concerted effort to keep readers calm?
I hemmed and hawed about including this next bit out of fear it would muddle my question. Feel free to ignore it if you want.
Looking at myself as a typical TBolts reader, I'm trying to take a wait and see attitude. I gave FightBolts an issue, I'll do at least the same with the upcoming changes. That said, the characters shown at the end of CW4 left me very cold. I don't know whether my interest in Songbird could overcome my antipathy for Venom (to whom I feel like if we're going to use such an overexposed character, why not just throw in Wolverine too) and, to a lesser degree, Lady Deathstrike. Also, my initial reaction is this looks like it's going to be a Suicide Squad-style book, which isn't quite the same as what TBolts has been.
On the writing side, if the Lying in the Gutters rumors/speculation about Jenkins are true (which is a bit ironic, since wasn't he the faux writer for faux Exiles in the simulation), I'm left to think that this story is going to have to be better than what I've read of his work to date to keep me on board. That's balanced by the idea that there's something new in the works for Nicieza, whose work I'm a fan of; I don't potentially feel like I need to drop the title out of some (misguided?) protest over his removal (even though I have no idea at this point if he was ready to move on or not).
Again, not asking you to confirm any of that, just trying to lay out what I think you have to deal with to keep people like me from overreacting before the product's ever out.
And now I'm off to watch "Heroes" and "Studio 60." (Speaking of which, how about getting Sorkin to pitch something?)
Posted by motteditor on 2006-09-26 01:39:11
Questions on Civil War
Hi Tom: I wanted to see if the editorial staff at Marvel has discussed the idea of super beings coming to Canada or running to other countries looking for asylum or refuge status? I think that could prove to be very interesting to see addressed in either Frontline, if not Civil War itself. If the US has literally instigated a Draft based on discrimination (only super powered beings are being drafted) and no age limit, then Canada may be open to accepting numerous super powered beings as refugees or conscientious objectors fleeing persecution. How about a one-shot special "Civil War: Refugees"?
Posted by Riddick2 on 2006-09-26 11:30:54
I wrote a response to your post on Friday about Marvel characters being immortal:
http://www.whyilovecomics.com/2006/09/26/reacting-to-a-tom-brevoort-post-the-marvel-universe-as-experiment/
Here's a question I'd like to ask: How important is eyeflow to a comic's page design? By eyeflow, I mean that the elements on the page flow from left to right and up to down. This used to be a given in comics, but I've seen pages lately that force the reader to move his/her eyes in different directions to follow the story, and I wonder if the concept had been devalued.
Posted by wishlish on 2006-09-26 12:17:52