Loving this
I guess it might go without saying, but I am loving this behind the scenes look. I wasn't really a reader of Civil War, but I find the planning behind it fascinating. In some ways, it makes me live Civil War!
Also - this also goes without saying (cause these blogs seem to always have issues) but the past Civil War posts seem to have vanished.
Thanks again Tom!
Posted by kevhines on 2007-07-23 20:23:35
More thanks for the behind-the-scenes!
A couple of quick thoughts-
1. Good choice, switching costumes on Spidey's identity reveal. It looks great as Iron Spidey, but... it has much more mainstream appeal as the real Spidey.
2. Aw, I would have loved that "Hunt for Spider-Man" series. Sadly, I think the reveal of Peter Parker sort of took the wind out of those sails. Still, New New Thunderbolts is great, and I am sure SOMEDAY Norman Osborn will be back to playing hell with Peter. once everyone forgets his identity again, somehow...
Jordan D. White
Posted by cracksh0t on 2007-07-23 22:17:29
please sir...
...may I have more? Tom, this behind the scenes tour is gold. If I were Oliver Twist, I would be in line for seconds. This post in many ways was my favorite because not only do we get behind the scenes, we also get to see how editors and writers outline their plots. Some make it...some don't. I loved this!
Posted by bigdaddyhub2 on 2007-07-24 00:18:16
Since this seems to be close to the actual re
...I wonder when the decision was made to drop the whole H.A.M.M.E.R. idea and replace it with S.H.I.E.L.D....
Posted by Michael Heide on 2007-07-24 09:04:02
Some questions
July 24, 2007
Dear Mr. Brevoort:
I´m wrighting this letter to ask you a few things.
First. I´m Argentinian, so, i don´t know talk a lot of english, but, as i learn english in my school, i can, i think, talk well.
Second. Here in Argentina, we haven´t a Marvel Sucursal, or something like that. So, i don´t know where i have to send my next setter talking about a summer job in Marvel.
Third. I read the letter that you receive from Mrs. Suzanne Gaffney, talking about your interest in become a Marvel intern.
In this part of the letter, i have to ask you something. Do i have to be an older ager to have the posibilitie to become in a Marvel intern?
I have to tell you. I have fourteen years old, in agoust 17, i will fifteen years old.
Other question that i have (sorry for all the questions that i´m doing) is, i will have a mentor or something like that? Becasuse, i never be in a place as important as Marvel, and i think that i´ll have a little presion on my shoulders if i don´t work well.
Also, i want to know if, to become a Marvel Intern, i have to have some Draw knowdeledges. I think, that i have a little, but i like the anime toons. I don´t know if that is a contradiction to Marvel, but my objetive is not only become a Marvel Intern, also, make better my draw skill.
Well, thank you to had take your time to read my letter;
María Belén Peluffo Lupiano
Ushuaia, Argentina
Tel: (02901) 436 – 362
Cel: (02901) 15516646
P.S: If you think that i can´t be a Marvel Intern, can you be my mentor? If you worked in marvel, i think that you know draw, don´t you?. I will wait your answer.
Posted by Rika Osutaki on 2007-07-24 13:46:02
Hey, Maria...
You might want to check out this link:
http://www.marvel.com/company/webinterns.htm
Posted by Michael Heide on 2007-07-25 10:24:47
Thank you Michael Heide
Thank tou very much. I apreaciate that. ;)
Posted by Rika Osutaki on 2007-07-25 11:16:51
You're welcome. :o)
Posted by Michael Heide on 2007-07-25 18:07:06
Heroes Fighting Heroes
As you’re probably aware, Mr. Brevoort, “Civil War” was criticized harshly online in various forums, because the political content was a sham, a mere pretext for inducing heroes to fight heroes. The real-world approach to fighting suspect or objectionable legislation is to go to a federal court and challenge the law’s constitutionality. The legal process wasn’t a major part of “Civil War,” obviously.
The shallowness of the political content has been demonstrated by the “Mighty Avengers” vs. “New Avengers” continuing plotline in NEW AVENGERS, which has the NA treated as lawbreakers simply because they haven’t registered, not because they’re actively doing anything illegal.
Since heroes fighting heroes (HfH) was so successful, is that why “World War Hulk” is also emphasizing HfH, and the “Skrulls” storyline, by causing heroes to suspect each other, seems destined to focus on HfH as well?
Marvel has given readers the impression that the company has decided heroes fighting villains, in the classical sense of good versus evil, is boring and/or old-fashioned, and that HfH is new and exciting. The cynical view is that HfH is merely a gimmick aimed at short-term readers, and that when even those readers realize how shallow the gimmick is, Marvel will have trouble finding another type of opponent. After all, the heroes have to fight somebody, don’t they?
Marvel’s emphasis on capturing the interest of new and short-term readers also raises questions about how the “Skrulls” storyline might violate continuity. Claiming that any member of the Illuminati has been a Skrull since the Kree-Skrull War would be false, in a literary sense. Claremont, in UXM, for example, was writing Xavier, not a Skrull impersonating Xavier. BTW, the Knaufs’ “Execute Program” arc in IRON MAN #7-#12, by retconning Iron Man’s origin, made a claim that Stark has been a Skrull prior to that storyline impossible.
Continuity is obviously a major concern of mine, and deservedly so, because honoring continuity while devising imaginative and innovative plots is a major factor in making stories art. Fantasy constructed within limits is potentially art; fantasy stories written without limits are merely collections of random events.
BTW, had the creators of “Civil War” been familiar with Marvel’s history, they’d have realized that the project and its aftermath simply repeated the basic premise of the “Serpent Crown” storyline in Englehart’s AVENGERS. Replace the Squadron Supreme with the Mighty Avengers and one winds up with very similar scenarios, including the conspiracy between businessmen, government officials, and heroes.
SRS
Posted by Steven R. Stahl on 2007-07-26 14:30:38
Heroes Fighting Heroes - Response and Thought
Some initial thought to SRS:
While obviously the legal aspects of “Civil War” (CW) were not shown in detail in the story, irregardless, the CW story tells us that the Registration Law had been passed, and that all super powered people need to register with the government. Hence registering IS the law in the Marvel Universe, so when the New Avengers do not register and use their super power, they are in fact breaking the law. You know its like if I buy a gun and do not register it and get caught using it, I would have broken the law.
While I thought it would be more interesting, at least to me, to see how the Registration Law passed and what kind of appeals and lawsuits came from it in detail, I understand that most fans would be board by this. CW is from the view point of Iron Man and Captain America and the groups they lead, not from two opposing politicians. I understand why Marvel chose to do this- to make money. I seriously doubt as many comic books would have been sold if each issue had little or no super-heroes in the comic and just focused on lawyers, politicians, and judges. While in the “real-world” passing laws and federal court process may take long periods of time, then again in the “real world”, “super-heroes” with “super powers” aren’t real.
I don’t think the idea of heroes fighting heroes (HfH) is new in comics, especially for the Marvel Universe. In Contest of Champions I & II heroes fought each other. In fact HfH took place way back in Fantastic Four Vol 1 #25 when the Thing fist fought the Hulk. Although I do love the classic good vsersus evil stories, where characters morals and thoughts are clearly defined by black and white concepts, I think the HfH is a nice change of pace.
CW starts as Marvel introduces the concept of change into their universe. As things change, and people naturally question change (such as new laws), people sometimes shift from being either black or white to a grey or a middle ground. It is characters in the grey I find interesting, after all, how you deal with change is an important part of life. So, as things change in the Marvel Universe, classic good characters such as Captain America no longer accept the change and become grey and engages in HfH (until the end, when Cap re-finds his morals). Other Marvel characters have always been in the grey.
Historically the Hulk has always been a grey character, supposedly a good guy through out his series, he was always engaged in HfH. Is really WWH (except in a much larger scale) like the Hulk fighting the Thing way back in FF #25. In FF #25 the Hulk is angry at the Fantastic Four so he fights them. Additionally such characters as Namor have also been a grey character. While considered a good guy, he often fought good guys,- he even fights Iron Man in “Atlantis Attacks“ and the Avengers through out their series. And don’t forget the Punisher, who has always been the bad good guy who fought other heroes.
That being said, the HfH in WWH, which is most likely a short term story (except for maybe the aftermath in the Hulk series itself), may be “gimmick” story (I assume Marvel likes these types of stories because they make money on it- damn capitalist…). Other gimmick stories I think marvel has published in the past are: Age of apocalypse, Acts of Vengeance, Inferno, and Contest of Champions I & II. In the Contest of Champions, which was a popular mini series, the result of the series is the Elders become immortal. The Elders are minor characters in the Marvel Universe, what major impact does this have on the Marvel Universe and continuity? It was basically just HfH, though very entertaining at that.
Continuing, it’s a little naive to say “Marvel will have trouble finding another type of opponent”. While I haven’t read every single Marvel comic, I’m sure through out the years, good guys always fought somebody or something. After all, Captain America originally fought Nazis, then super-villains, super-heroes, politicians, SHIELD, terrorists, etc.. Your statement also seems to indicate that things will not change from current readership tastes and editorial and writer preferences. That of course is untrue (all tings change- it’s only natural), eventually Marvel will print a different types of stories.
Remember continuity changes in comic books, and is reinvented by generations of readers and writers to new generations of readers and writers. In fact, most of the Marvel Universe continuity is not pure and can be problematic, if you think about it. If I was an seemly obsessed absolutist, I would agree continuity is broken in the marvel universe. After all, how could Peter Parker who became spider-man in 1963 at age of 15 only be 30ish now in 2007? And what happened to the Clone Saga? How comes Marvel never mentions it, and in facts acts like it never happened, when in fact in print it did-another continuity problem. Or what ever happened to the teenage Tony Stark, how comes Marvel never mentions it? Or how come in the Tales of Suspense origin story, Tony Stark is 21 and in Vietnam when he adopts the armor, but in later comic book issues his origin story is in the gulf when he adopts the armor. I guess my point is this, continuity is an inherently flawed concept in the Marvel Universe in the long term. As things change and time passes, stories are reinvented or retold, using modern terms to adapt to changing writers and readership, culture and society. How hard would it be for a 15 year old boy to try to relate to Vietnam? It’s much easier for him to relate to the Gulf War. Please remember, time passes in the Marvel universe differently then in real life.
The statement: “Continuity is obviously a major concern of mine, and deservedly so, because honoring continuity while devising imaginative and innovative plots is a major factor in making stories art. Fantasy constructed within limits is potentially art; fantasy stories written without limits are merely collections of random events.” really show how absolute you are in your thoughts. How could “fantasy stories written without limits” not be art? I would assume you think WWH is not art? You may not like it, and you think its pointless and stupid, but it’s still art. While films, books, stories, painting and comic books are ratable things (they can win awards), they are still- most importantly- subject able things. How can one enforce on someone else to like art. Which story is better Watchmen or Squadron Supreme? I hate the movie “Dancer in the Dark”, I think its one of the worse films ever made, but my best friend thinks it is one of the best movies ever made. Who’s right?
And for assuming CW and it’s aftermath is nothing more the a rip off of the “Serpent Crown” saga, you may end up being right that the very very very basic idea of the Crown story could end up be very similar to the future Skull story. Its like Star Wars, you know that was nothing more then a rip off of Roman and Greek Mythology and the Lord of the Rings books. However, Star Wars turned into successful, and entertaining movie to most.
If it is true that Marvel decides that one of the Illuminati is in fact a Skrull, I too agree that may be a stretch, because how does a Skull know how to adopt a persons personality to a T? It will be interesting to see who really is a Skull and how it‘s all explained, but I don’t worry about it. Why- because its only a comic book. If I end up not liking the Skrull story I won’t read it and be overly obsessed and absolute about how much I dislike it.
Sal
Posted by Sal S. Hughes on 2007-07-27 02:02:10